Skip to content
Medical Thesis Topics

MDS

100 Forensic Odontology Thesis Topics

Academic session 2026-2027  · 100 topics

This page lists 100 forensic odontology thesis topics for Master of Dental Surgery postgraduate students for the 2026-2027 academic session. The topics are structured around practical dissertation questions that can be adapted to the clinical workload, imaging facilities, laboratory support, materials and records available in a dental teaching institution.

The forensic odontology thesis topics below cover age estimation, sex estimation, odontometrics, radiographic methods, bite marks, cheiloscopy, rugoscopy, fingerprints, dental identification, record keeping, disaster victim identification and professional knowledge. They include cross-sectional, observational, comparative, imaging-based, record-based and in-vitro approaches so that students can select a research question that matches their departmental resources while retaining a clearly measurable primary outcome.

Click any topic to open it in the protocol generator with the title already filled in.

  1. Estimation of chronological age using radiographic stages of third molar development among adolescents and young adults: a cross-sectional radiographic study.Get protocol
  2. Comparison of dental age and chronological age using the Demirjian method among children and adolescents: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  3. Accuracy of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation in an Indian paediatric population: a cross-sectional radiographic study.Get protocol
  4. Comparison of the Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation among Indian children: a comparative radiographic study.Get protocol
  5. Accuracy of the Willems method for estimation of chronological age among children using panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  6. Comparison of dental age estimation accuracy among male and female children using panoramic radiographs: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  7. Association between chronological age and developmental stages of mandibular third molars among young adults: an observational radiographic study.Get protocol
  8. Accuracy of mandibular third molar development for differentiating individuals below and above eighteen years of age: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.Get protocol
  9. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular third molar development for estimation of chronological age: a comparative radiographic study.Get protocol
  10. Bilateral symmetry of third molar development and its implications for dental age estimation: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  11. Estimation of adult age using pulp-to-tooth area ratio of maxillary canines on digital periapical radiographs: a cross-sectional radiomorphometric study.Get protocol
  12. Association between pulp-to-tooth area ratio and chronological age among adults: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  13. Comparison of pulp-to-tooth area ratio in maxillary and mandibular canines for adult age estimation: a comparative radiographic study.Get protocol
  14. Comparison of pulp-to-tooth area ratios among male and female adults for age estimation: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  15. Estimation of chronological age using pulp chamber dimensions of mandibular molars on panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  16. Comparison of age estimation using pulp chamber measurements of premolars and molars: a comparative radiomorphometric study.Get protocol
  17. Assessment of secondary dentin deposition as an indicator of chronological age using cone-beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional imaging study.Get protocol
  18. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional pulp measurements for adult age estimation: a comparative imaging study.Get protocol
  19. Development of a population-specific regression equation for dental age estimation using radiographic tooth measurements: a cross-sectional analytical study.Get protocol
  20. Comparison of accuracy of established dental age estimation methods and a population-specific model among Indian subjects: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  21. Assessment of sexual dimorphism using mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of permanent canines: a cross-sectional odontometric study.Get protocol
  22. Comparison of mandibular canine dimensions among male and female adults for sex estimation: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  23. Evaluation of mandibular canine index for sex estimation in an Indian population: a cross-sectional forensic study.Get protocol
  24. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular canine indices for sex estimation: a comparative odontometric study.Get protocol
  25. Assessment of sexual dimorphism using dimensions of permanent first molars: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  26. Comparison of odontometric measurements of premolars among male and female adults: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  27. Development of a discriminant function for sex estimation using selected permanent tooth dimensions: a cross-sectional analytical study.Get protocol
  28. Comparison of individual and combined odontometric parameters for sex estimation: a comparative forensic study.Get protocol
  29. Assessment of sexual dimorphism using mandibular morphometric parameters on panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional imaging study.Get protocol
  30. Comparison of mandibular ramus measurements among male and female adults using panoramic radiography: a comparative radiographic study.Get protocol
  31. Evaluation of gonial angle as an indicator of sex using panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  32. Comparison of gonial angle and ramus dimensions for sex estimation: a comparative radiomorphometric study.Get protocol
  33. Assessment of sexual dimorphism using mental foramen position and dimensions on panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional imaging study.Get protocol
  34. Comparison of mental foramen measurements among male and female adults using cone-beam computed tomography: a comparative imaging study.Get protocol
  35. Assessment of sexual dimorphism of the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  36. Comparison of maxillary sinus height, width and volume among male and female adults: a comparative three-dimensional imaging study.Get protocol
  37. Development of a sex-prediction model using maxillary sinus dimensions obtained from cone-beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional analytical study.Get protocol
  38. Assessment of sexual dimorphism using frontal sinus dimensions on available radiographic images: a cross-sectional forensic imaging study.Get protocol
  39. Comparison of mandibular and maxillary sinus morphometric parameters for sex estimation: a comparative imaging study.Get protocol
  40. Development of a multivariable model combining dental and mandibular measurements for sex estimation in an Indian population: a cross-sectional analytical study.Get protocol
  41. Assessment of palatal rugae patterns among young adults and their association with sex: a cross-sectional forensic study.Get protocol
  42. Comparison of palatal rugae patterns among male and female individuals: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  43. Evaluation of palatal rugae number, length and orientation for sex estimation: an observational morphometric study.Get protocol
  44. Comparison of palatal rugae patterns among individuals from different regional populations: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  45. Assessment of bilateral symmetry of palatal rugae patterns among young adults: a cross-sectional morphometric study.Get protocol
  46. Comparison of manual and digital methods for classification of palatal rugae patterns: a comparative agreement study.Get protocol
  47. Interobserver reliability of commonly used palatal rugae classification systems: a cross-sectional reliability study.Get protocol
  48. Development of a sex-prediction model using selected palatal rugae characteristics: a cross-sectional analytical study.Get protocol
  49. Prevalence and distribution of lip-print patterns among young adults: a cross-sectional forensic study.Get protocol
  50. Comparison of lip-print patterns among male and female individuals: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  51. Association between lip-print patterns and sex among an Indian young-adult population: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  52. Comparison of upper and lower lip-print patterns for sex estimation: a comparative forensic study.Get protocol
  53. Interobserver agreement in classification of lip-print patterns using conventional and digital methods: a cross-sectional agreement study.Get protocol
  54. Assessment of fingerprint patterns and their association with sex among young adults: a cross-sectional forensic study.Get protocol
  55. Comparison of fingerprint pattern distribution among male and female dental students: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  56. Association between fingerprint patterns and dental caries experience among young adults: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  57. Comparison of dermatoglyphic patterns among individuals with and without selected dental anomalies: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  58. Association between palatal rugae patterns and fingerprint patterns among young adults: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  59. Comparison of combined lip-print and fingerprint characteristics for sex estimation with either method used individually: a comparative analytical study.Get protocol
  60. Development of a combined identification model using palatal rugae, lip-print and fingerprint characteristics: a cross-sectional forensic study.Get protocol
  61. Assessment of uniqueness of anterior dental characteristics for human identification using dental casts: a cross-sectional morphometric study.Get protocol
  62. Comparison of dental arch dimensions among individuals for their potential application in forensic identification: a comparative model-based study.Get protocol
  63. Evaluation of uniqueness of restorative and morphological dental features on panoramic radiographs: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  64. Assessment of concordance between simulated antemortem and postmortem dental records for human identification: a comparative methodological study.Get protocol
  65. Comparison of accuracy of dental identification using panoramic and intraoral radiographic records: a comparative forensic study.Get protocol
  66. Assessment of observer accuracy in matching antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.Get protocol
  67. Comparison of dental radiograph matching accuracy among postgraduate dental students and experienced dental professionals: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  68. Interobserver agreement in forensic dental identification using panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional reliability study.Get protocol
  69. Comparison of manual and computer-assisted dental radiographic matching for forensic identification: a comparative methodological study.Get protocol
  70. Evaluation of root and crown morphological variations as potential identifiers using panoramic radiographs: a cross-sectional imaging study.Get protocol
  71. Assessment of endodontic and prosthetic treatment patterns as identifiers on dental radiographs: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  72. Comparison of identification potential of natural dental characteristics and dental restorations using radiographic records: a comparative study.Get protocol
  73. Assessment of knowledge and preparedness regarding disaster victim identification among dental practitioners: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  74. Comparison of knowledge regarding disaster victim identification among undergraduate interns and postgraduate dental students: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  75. Knowledge and attitudes regarding maintenance of dental records for forensic identification among dental practitioners: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  76. Comparison of dental record-keeping practices among practitioners working in institutional and private dental settings: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  77. Assessment of completeness of dental records for their potential usefulness in forensic identification: a retrospective record-based study.Get protocol
  78. Knowledge and practices regarding forensic photography and radiographic documentation among dental professionals: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  79. Assessment of knowledge regarding forensic evaluation of patterned injuries and bite marks among dental professionals: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  80. Comparison of awareness of contemporary limitations of bite-mark analysis among dental students and practicing dentists: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  81. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding forensic odontology among dental practitioners: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  82. Comparison of forensic odontology knowledge among undergraduate interns and postgraduate dental students: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  83. Association between previous forensic odontology training and knowledge scores among dental professionals: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  84. Awareness of the role of dentists in forensic investigations among dental students: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  85. Comparison of awareness of forensic dental responsibilities among general dental practitioners and dental specialists: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  86. Knowledge and practices regarding preservation of dental evidence among dental professionals: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  87. Knowledge regarding chain of custody and handling of forensic dental evidence among postgraduate dental students: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  88. Comparison of knowledge regarding legal and ethical aspects of forensic dental practice among junior and senior dental trainees: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  89. Awareness of deoxyribonucleic acid-based identification methods using dental tissues among dental professionals: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  90. Comparison of knowledge regarding dental deoxyribonucleic acid sources and preservation among undergraduate and postgraduate dental students: a comparative cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  91. Comparison of quantity and quality of deoxyribonucleic acid recovered from different extracted dental tissues under standardized laboratory conditions: an in-vitro comparative study.Get protocol
  92. Effect of selected environmental conditions on recovery of deoxyribonucleic acid from extracted teeth: an in-vitro comparative study.Get protocol
  93. Comparison of different tooth types as sources of dental deoxyribonucleic acid under standardized laboratory conditions: an in-vitro study.Get protocol
  94. Assessment of three-dimensional dental scanning for recording odontometric parameters used in forensic identification: a methodological study.Get protocol
  95. Comparison of conventional dental cast measurements and three-dimensional digital model measurements for forensic odontometry: a comparative study.Get protocol
  96. Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted dental age estimation compared with conventional radiographic age estimation: a comparative diagnostic study.Get protocol
  97. Comparison of artificial intelligence-assisted and observer-based sex estimation using panoramic radiographic mandibular measurements: a comparative diagnostic study.Get protocol
  98. Diagnostic accuracy of automated dental radiograph matching compared with manual matching for simulated forensic identification: a comparative methodological study.Get protocol
  99. Knowledge and attitudes regarding artificial intelligence and digital technologies in forensic odontology among dental postgraduate students: a cross-sectional study.Get protocol
  100. Awareness, perceived barriers and training needs regarding forensic odontology among dental practitioners in India: an observational cross-sectional study.Get protocol

Choosing a Forensic Odontology thesis topic

How should I choose a feasible Forensic Odontology thesis topic?

Start with the cases, records, imaging facilities, laboratory methods and materials that are consistently available in your department. A feasible forensic odontology thesis should have a clearly defined primary outcome and should not depend on expensive equipment or rare patients unless access is already assured. Before finalizing the protocol, review recent departmental case numbers, identify the variables that can be measured reliably, and decide whether the proposed comparison groups are realistically available. A focused question with adequate numbers is usually stronger than a technically ambitious project that cannot recruit or complete its planned measurements.

Which study designs are practical for an MDS thesis in Forensic Odontology?

Cross-sectional, comparative cross-sectional, retrospective record-based, imaging-based and in-vitro designs are often practical for an MDS dissertation because they can be completed within a defined academic period. The best design depends on the research question and available resources. Clinical prevalence or association questions generally suit cross-sectional methods, existing case records can support retrospective studies, and material or technique comparisons may suit controlled in-vitro work. The protocol should specify the sampling method, primary variable, measurement technique and statistical comparison in advance rather than selecting a design solely because it appears easy to conduct.

What should be checked before finalizing a Forensic Odontology dissertation protocol?

Confirm that the department can provide enough eligible observations during the proposed study period and that every major variable can be measured using a standardized method. For imaging or record-based work, review a small sample of existing records to assess completeness and consistency. For in-vitro projects, verify availability of specimens, materials, equipment and the testing method before calculating the sample size. The final protocol should clearly separate the primary objective from secondary objectives, define inclusion and exclusion criteria, identify potential confounders where relevant, and use outcomes that directly answer the stated research question.

Thesis and protocol questions

How is a thesis topic different from a thesis protocol?

The topic is the title — the question a study sets out to answer, together with the population and the design. The protocol is the full document built around it: background, review of literature, aims and objectives, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size calculation, methodology, statistical plan, ethics considerations, consent documents and references. A topic is agreed with a guide first; the protocol is written afterwards and submitted to the institutional ethics committee.

When does a postgraduate thesis have to be submitted?

For most Indian postgraduate programmes the protocol is submitted within the first six months of joining, and the completed thesis is submitted at least six months before the final examination. Exact deadlines are set by the university, so the departmental circular for the current session takes precedence over any general timeline.

How is sample size decided for a postgraduate thesis?

Sample size follows from the primary objective, not the other way round. A prevalence study is powered from an expected proportion and an acceptable margin of error; a comparative study is powered from the expected difference between groups, the standard deviation, alpha and desired power. The figure should then be checked against the institution's actual case load for the study period, because a statistically ideal sample that cannot be recruited in the time available is not a workable plan.

Does a thesis topic need ethics committee approval?

Yes. Every postgraduate thesis involving human participants, human data or human samples requires clearance from the institutional ethics committee before data collection begins. Approval is granted on the protocol rather than on the title, and the submission usually includes the protocol, the participant information sheet and the consent form in English and in the local language.

What makes a topic realistic for a three-year postgraduate programme?

A workable topic can be completed at a single centre, with equipment and investigations that are already available in routine practice, within roughly eighteen months of data collection. Topics that depend on external funding, specialised assays, multicentre coordination or long follow-up tend to stall. Choosing a condition the department already sees in volume matters more than choosing a novel one.

Can a thesis be published as a research paper afterwards?

Yes, and it is generally expected. A thesis is usually condensed into a paper of around three to four thousand words, restructured into the standard introduction, methods, results and discussion format, with the review of literature shortened considerably. Journals differ in their requirements, and the ethics approval number from the original thesis is normally cited in the methods section.

Picked a topic? Generate the protocol