Skip to content
Medical Thesis Topics

FNB · DrNB · PDCC

30 Advanced Endoscopy Thesis Topics

Academic session 2026-2027  · 30 topics

This page lists 30 advanced endoscopy thesis topics for FNB, DrNB and PDCC candidates in India for the 2026-2027 academic session. Advanced endoscopy generates its own research material at each procedure: indication, technique, yield and complications are recorded in the procedure log and images are archived, making retrospective studies practical without additional patient contact.

The advanced endoscopy thesis topics below are built on that procedural record. They cover endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound and sampling, endoscopic haemostasis, endoscopic resection and ablation, enteroscopy, and the quality indicators that define advanced endoscopy practice.

Click any topic to open it in the protocol generator with the title already filled in.

  1. A cross-sectional study of the indications and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGet protocol
  2. An observational study of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and its risk factorsGet protocol
  3. A study of the outcome of biliary stenting for benign and malignant biliary obstructionGet protocol
  4. An observational study of the rate and determinants of failed cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGet protocol
  5. A comparative study of two cannulation techniques on success rate and complication riskGet protocol
  6. A cross-sectional study of the stone clearance rate following endoscopic sphincterotomy and lithotripsyGet protocol
  7. An observational study of the technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in surgically altered anatomyGet protocol
  8. A study of cholangitis complicating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and its managementGet protocol
  9. An observational study of the diagnostic yield and complications of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspirationGet protocol
  10. A cross-sectional study of the concordance between endoscopic ultrasound staging and surgical pathological stagingGet protocol
  11. An observational study of the technical success of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainageGet protocol
  12. A study of linear versus radial endoscopic ultrasound in the characterisation of pancreatic lesionsGet protocol
  13. An observational study of the endoscopic haemostasis technique used and its outcome in acute upper gastrointestinal bleedingGet protocol
  14. A cross-sectional study of the rebleeding rate and its predictors following endoscopic therapyGet protocol
  15. An observational study of the endoscopic mucosal resection outcome for superficial colorectal lesionsGet protocol
  16. A study of the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen margins and completeness of resectionGet protocol
  17. An observational study of delayed bleeding following endoscopic resection proceduresGet protocol
  18. A cross-sectional study of the endoscopic ablation outcome for Barrett oesophagusGet protocol
  19. An observational study of the diagnostic yield of single balloon enteroscopy in deep small bowel diseaseGet protocol
  20. A study of the technical success and complication rate of capsule endoscopyGet protocol
  21. An observational study of the clinical and endoscopic findings in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleedingGet protocol
  22. A cross-sectional study of the endoscopic findings in patients with portal hypertensive gastropathyGet protocol
  23. An observational study of endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus block and pain outcomeGet protocol
  24. A study of the technical success and outcome of endoscopic cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocystGet protocol
  25. An observational study of the adenoma detection rate and its determinants in screening colonoscopyGet protocol
  26. A cross-sectional study of the caecal intubation rate and quality indicators in colonoscopyGet protocol
  27. An observational study of the diagnostic yield of chromoendoscopy in surveillance colonoscopyGet protocol
  28. A study of the fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGet protocol
  29. An observational study of sedation practice and adverse events during advanced endoscopic proceduresGet protocol
  30. A cross-sectional study of the learning curve for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGet protocol

Choosing a Advanced Endoscopy thesis topic

What makes an advanced endoscopy fellowship thesis distinct from a gastroenterology one?

Access to complex procedures and their metrics. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography success rates by indication, endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration yield, endoscopic mucosal resection margins and endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen adequacy are all procedure-level data unavailable to a gastroenterology trainee.

Are complication rates a good thesis topic?

Yes, and they are often the most practically valuable. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related pancreatitis, bleeding after endoscopic resection, and perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection are all recordable, graded on established classifications, and amenable to risk factor analysis using data already in the procedure log.

What sample size is realistic?

A unit performing two or more endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures a day supports one to two hundred cases over twelve months. Endoscopic ultrasound and resection volumes vary but are lower; those should cover every case in the fellowship period.

Thesis and protocol questions

How is a thesis topic different from a thesis protocol?

The topic is the title — the question a study sets out to answer, together with the population and the design. The protocol is the full document built around it: background, review of literature, aims and objectives, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size calculation, methodology, statistical plan, ethics considerations, consent documents and references. A topic is agreed with a guide first; the protocol is written afterwards and submitted to the institutional ethics committee.

When does a postgraduate thesis have to be submitted?

For most Indian postgraduate programmes the protocol is submitted within the first six months of joining, and the completed thesis is submitted at least six months before the final examination. Exact deadlines are set by the university, so the departmental circular for the current session takes precedence over any general timeline.

How is sample size decided for a postgraduate thesis?

Sample size follows from the primary objective, not the other way round. A prevalence study is powered from an expected proportion and an acceptable margin of error; a comparative study is powered from the expected difference between groups, the standard deviation, alpha and desired power. The figure should then be checked against the institution's actual case load for the study period, because a statistically ideal sample that cannot be recruited in the time available is not a workable plan.

Does a thesis topic need ethics committee approval?

Yes. Every postgraduate thesis involving human participants, human data or human samples requires clearance from the institutional ethics committee before data collection begins. Approval is granted on the protocol rather than on the title, and the submission usually includes the protocol, the participant information sheet and the consent form in English and in the local language.

What makes a topic realistic for a three-year postgraduate programme?

A workable topic can be completed at a single centre, with equipment and investigations that are already available in routine practice, within roughly eighteen months of data collection. Topics that depend on external funding, specialised assays, multicentre coordination or long follow-up tend to stall. Choosing a condition the department already sees in volume matters more than choosing a novel one.

Can a thesis be published as a research paper afterwards?

Yes, and it is generally expected. A thesis is usually condensed into a paper of around three to four thousand words, restructured into the standard introduction, methods, results and discussion format, with the review of literature shortened considerably. Journals differ in their requirements, and the ethics approval number from the original thesis is normally cited in the methods section.

Picked a topic? Generate the protocol