MS · DNB
50 MS General Surgery Thesis Topics
Academic session 2026-2027 · 50 topics
This page lists 50 general surgery thesis topics for postgraduate candidates in India for the 2026-2027 academic session. Surgical theses carry a constraint that medical ones do not: any question about operative outcome needs follow-up, and follow-up in a three-year programme is short and often incomplete. The topics here are written with that in mind.
The general surgery thesis topics below concentrate on questions answerable within a short postoperative window — wound infection, early complications, length of stay, pain scores at defined intervals — alongside cross-sectional work on presentation, imaging and diagnostic scoring. They cover the conditions any surgical unit sees daily: gallstone disease, hernia, appendicitis, breast lumps, thyroid swellings, anorectal disease and trauma.
Click any topic to open it in the protocol generator with the title already filled in.
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical and ultrasonographic profile of patients presenting with symptomatic gallstone diseaseGet protocol
- A comparative study of operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomyGet protocol
- An observational study of the frequency and reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomyGet protocol
- Evaluation of ultrasonographic predictors of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy against intraoperative findingsGet protocol
- A study of the frequency of incidental carcinoma detected in gallbladder specimens removed for benign diseaseGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical profile and anatomical types of inguinal hernia in adults presenting for elective repairGet protocol
- A comparative study of postoperative pain and early complications between laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal herniaGet protocol
- An observational study of surgical site infection following mesh repair of ventral hernia within thirty days of surgeryGet protocol
- A study of the clinical presentation and operative findings in patients undergoing emergency surgery for obstructed or strangulated herniaGet protocol
- Evaluation of the Alvarado score against histopathological findings in patients undergoing appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitisGet protocol
- A comparative study of ultrasonography and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adultsGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the aetiology and clinical presentation of patients admitted with acute abdomenGet protocol
- An observational study of the clinical profile and operative findings in patients with hollow viscus perforationGet protocol
- A study of the causes, management and early outcome of acute intestinal obstruction in adultsGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical, radiological and cytological profile of patients presenting with a palpable breast lumpGet protocol
- Evaluation of the triple assessment approach against histopathology in the diagnosis of palpable breast lumpsGet protocol
- An observational study of the stage at presentation and clinicopathological profile of patients with carcinoma of the breastGet protocol
- A comparative study of seroma formation following mastectomy with and without a defined drain protocolGet protocol
- A study of awareness of breast self-examination among women attending a surgical outpatient departmentGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical and cytological profile of patients presenting with solitary thyroid noduleGet protocol
- Evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology against histopathology in the diagnosis of thyroid swellingsGet protocol
- An observational study of early postoperative complications following thyroidectomy for benign thyroid diseaseGet protocol
- A study of voice change assessed by a validated questionnaire before and after thyroidectomyGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical profile and endoscopic findings in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal bleedingGet protocol
- An observational study of the clinicopathological profile and stage at presentation of patients with colorectal carcinomaGet protocol
- A comparative study of postoperative recovery parameters between patients managed with and without early enteral feeding after intestinal surgeryGet protocol
- A study of stoma-related complications and quality of life among patients with a temporary intestinal stomaGet protocol
- An observational study of the clinical presentation and operative findings in patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma of the stomachGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the pattern of injuries and initial management of patients presenting with blunt abdominal traumaGet protocol
- Evaluation of focused assessment with sonography for trauma against computed tomography in patients with blunt abdominal traumaGet protocol
- An observational study of the outcome of non-operative management in haemodynamically stable patients with solid organ injuryGet protocol
- A study of the injury pattern, severity score and early outcome of patients presenting with polytraumaGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following elective abdominal surgeryGet protocol
- A comparative study of wound healing and infection rates between two methods of skin closure after laparotomyGet protocol
- An observational study of the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of surgical site infectionsGet protocol
- A study of the clinical profile and outcome of patients with diabetic foot ulcer managed at a surgical unitGet protocol
- A comparative study of healing outcomes between conventional dressing and negative pressure wound therapy in chronic woundsGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical profile of patients presenting with benign anorectal disease to a surgical outpatient departmentGet protocol
- A comparative study of postoperative pain and return to work between open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexyGet protocol
- An observational study of early outcomes following surgery for fistula in anoGet protocol
- A study of the clinical presentation and management outcome of patients with pilonidal sinus diseaseGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical profile of patients presenting with varicose veins of the lower limbGet protocol
- An observational study of the clinical presentation and management of patients with peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbGet protocol
- A study of the clinical and ultrasonographic profile of patients presenting with scrotal swellingGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the clinical presentation and histopathological profile of patients with soft tissue swellingsGet protocol
- An observational study of unplanned readmission within thirty days of discharge following major abdominal surgeryGet protocol
- A comparative study of postoperative pain scores between laparoscopic and open appendicectomy at defined intervals in the first forty-eight hoursGet protocol
- An observational study of the adoption and completeness of the surgical safety checklist in an operating theatreGet protocol
- A study of preoperative anxiety assessed by a validated scale among patients scheduled for elective surgeryGet protocol
- A cross-sectional study of the appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis against institutional protocolGet protocol
Reached the end of the list?
Thousands more General Surgery thesis topics, updated through the year.
More General Surgery topics on medicalthesistopics.comChoosing a MS General Surgery thesis topic
Can a general surgery thesis compare two operative techniques?
It can, but the outcome measures have to be reachable within the residency. Comparing two techniques on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain scores at twenty-four and forty-eight hours, wound infection rate and length of hospital stay is achievable. Comparing them on recurrence at five years is not. Choose short-horizon outcomes and state the follow-up period explicitly in the protocol, because ethics committees will ask.
How much follow-up should a surgical thesis plan for?
Thirty days covers most wound and early complication outcomes and is realistic to achieve. Ninety days is possible for a smaller sample if the department has a functioning follow-up clinic. Beyond that, attrition becomes the dominant problem in Indian settings, particularly where patients travel long distances, and a study that loses forty per cent of its participants will not produce a defensible result whatever its design.
What sample size is realistic for a general surgery thesis?
For common procedures such as cholecystectomy, hernia repair or appendicectomy, one hundred to two hundred cases over eighteen months is usually achievable at a teaching hospital. Randomised comparisons need both arms to fill, so check that the less frequently performed technique has enough volume before committing. For uncommon presentations, a descriptive study of all cases over the study period is often the only honest design.
Thesis and protocol questions
How is a thesis topic different from a thesis protocol?
The topic is the title — the question a study sets out to answer, together with the population and the design. The protocol is the full document built around it: background, review of literature, aims and objectives, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size calculation, methodology, statistical plan, ethics considerations, consent documents and references. A topic is agreed with a guide first; the protocol is written afterwards and submitted to the institutional ethics committee.
When does a postgraduate thesis have to be submitted?
For most Indian postgraduate programmes the protocol is submitted within the first six months of joining, and the completed thesis is submitted at least six months before the final examination. Exact deadlines are set by the university, so the departmental circular for the current session takes precedence over any general timeline.
How is sample size decided for a postgraduate thesis?
Sample size follows from the primary objective, not the other way round. A prevalence study is powered from an expected proportion and an acceptable margin of error; a comparative study is powered from the expected difference between groups, the standard deviation, alpha and desired power. The figure should then be checked against the institution's actual case load for the study period, because a statistically ideal sample that cannot be recruited in the time available is not a workable plan.
Does a thesis topic need ethics committee approval?
Yes. Every postgraduate thesis involving human participants, human data or human samples requires clearance from the institutional ethics committee before data collection begins. Approval is granted on the protocol rather than on the title, and the submission usually includes the protocol, the participant information sheet and the consent form in English and in the local language.
What makes a topic realistic for a three-year postgraduate programme?
A workable topic can be completed at a single centre, with equipment and investigations that are already available in routine practice, within roughly eighteen months of data collection. Topics that depend on external funding, specialised assays, multicentre coordination or long follow-up tend to stall. Choosing a condition the department already sees in volume matters more than choosing a novel one.
Can a thesis be published as a research paper afterwards?
Yes, and it is generally expected. A thesis is usually condensed into a paper of around three to four thousand words, restructured into the standard introduction, methods, results and discussion format, with the review of literature shortened considerably. Journals differ in their requirements, and the ethics approval number from the original thesis is normally cited in the methods section.